What About Those Other Cancers? Prevent What You Can, Fight What You Can’t

 

DDTTime to put on my skeptic’s hat.

The news has again been filled with various reports on cancer, cancer prevention, and cancer treatment. Some of this news has shown up in my mail – both snail and electronic. First came the plea for contributions from the American Cancer Society, with the optimistic headline that says “Yes, we are beating cancer!” This headline is backed up by statistics stating there’s been a 25% decline in cancer death rates since 1991, and that “more than 2.1 million cancer deaths have been avoided during this time!”

Their crystal ball must be pretty good to be able to see what *didn’t* happen during this time span. A decrease in cancer deaths, while great news, doesn’t tell you that cancer rates are expected to rise.

Then there was the email notice from the Cancer Prevention Institute of California (motto: “Preventing Cancer. Promoting Life.”) that includes an “infographic” (a.k.a., chart) of ways that you can reduce your risk of cancer by one third to one half. The list has the usual steps: eat a balanced and healthful diet, get exercise, protect yourself from the sun, get the HPV vaccine, and avoid smoking and eating too much red meat. This is useful – but not exactly cutting edge – information indicating that the 30% to 50% risk reduction relates primarily to cancers of the colon, lung, skin, and a basketful of general cancers not entirely specified.

Also in this email is a link to a press release about a study of triple negative breast cancer, which found that “women under the age of 50 who breastfed for at least 24 months over their lifetime had a lower risk of developing TNBC. For women with three or more full-term pregnancies, risk increased two-fold if they did not breastfeed or only did so for less than a year. No increase in risk was seen for women who breast-fed for more than a year.”

Feeling confused? So am I, and I even try to keep up with the research on TNBC. These latest findings still don’t explain why I ended up with that particular cancer. According to this study – and the fact that I generally lived by the tips on the infographic — I should have been at low risk for cancer in general.

At this juncture on Cancer Road, I’ve stopped thinking there will ever be a single cure for cancer, or even one cure for everyone with a single type of cancer. The more research is done, the more clear it becomes that the term cancer covers an ever-increasing number and variety of cell abnormalities. Though there may be cures for some specific cancers, this disease will always be a few steps ahead of science.

I am grateful for (and contribute to) the researchers who dedicate their life’s work to finding cures, and appreciate the various organizations that try to educate us about risks and prevention. Though I understand the need for optimism and see the value in charting progress, none of it explains why — if you do the math — 50% to 70% of cancers don’t seem to be preventable, at least not by controlling the factors listed in the infographic.

If we can control some of the risks that lead to certain cancers, there must be ways to prevent others as well. But the prevention information peddled to the general public doesn’t address how to do this. The information largely puts the burden of prevention on the individual – do this, don’t do that — and ignores the larger picture.

During this month, which honors cancer prevention, I’ve been reading a book that, at first glance, doesn’t seem directly related to the topic: Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson. Published in 1962, the book details the drastic increase in the use of pesticides and herbicides since 1945, and their catastrophic effect on fish, plants, wildlife and — it turns out — humans throughout the 1950s. This book is generally credited with advancing the environmental movement, though Carson herself died of breast cancer two years after the book came out.

Carson’s findings aren’t news to those who know her work or are active in the environmental movement. Reading Silent Spring reminded me of the environmental chemicals I was exposed to over the years (weed killers, insecticides, household cleaners, chlorine in swimming pools), some of which I had control over and most of which I didn’t (DDT wasn’t banned in the U.S. till 1972, when I was 12).

Connecting these various dots, I’d like to propose two steps:

  1. Prevent what you can: Along with eating well and giving up smoking – activities we have control over — we should give up using harmful environmental chemicals whenever possible. (Throw away those ridiculous air fresheners and welcome the weeds in the lawn.)
  2. Fight what you can’t: Petition the manufacturers of such chemicals to assign some of their scientists to cancer studies in search of a cure. After all, if they’re going to create cancer-causing agents, the least they can do is try to repair the damage.

Maybe then we’ll see a decrease not just in cancer deaths, but in the rates of those other cancers too.

For a list of top 116 cancer-causing chemicals and activities, click here. See how many of these you can remove from your life.

Advertisements

6 Responses to “What About Those Other Cancers? Prevent What You Can, Fight What You Can’t”

  1. Dee Freeman Says:

    And while you are at it, stop putting fertilizer on your lawn to make the weeds grow faster as well, refuse to but products with chemical scents, etc. Both of my sisters who died young from cancer colored their hair and the list goes on. Cancer is not the only outcome of chemical exposure so avoiding chemical compounds in general seems a wuss course. Do you really need gaur gum in your yogurt?

  2. Julie Yamamoto Says:

    Guar gum, eh? I haven’t seen that in my yogurt, but you can be sure I’ll check more closely now.
    I think of all the chemicals we buy (and buy into) to “enhance” our lives: creams and lotions of all kinds and perfume, hair products, nail polish (and the nasty stuff that takes it off), makeup, How much of this do we do as we are growing up, when our bodies are more vulnerable to chemical and other influences. The list of 116 items even implicates the ubiquitous hand sanitizers. And then there were those chemical fogs we walked through as children that were designed to wipe out mosquitos. Carson’s descriptions of the effects of the chemical dumps are horrifying. Those of us born after 1945 were perhaps doomed before we ever saw life. I think of us as the (first) cancer generation. In 1962, she predicted that 1 of every 4 people would be affected by cancer. She missed the mark — predictions now are 1 in every 2 men and 1 in every 3 women.

  3. Nancy Mackin Says:

    Wouldn’t it seem wise to introduce measures (such as a health tax on pesticides and herbicides used in the food industry, with tax dollars directed back into cancer research) so that organic foods are less costly than those grown with “‘-cides”? Something has to be done to reverse the “silent spring” while addressing the amount of poisons ingested or breathed by present and future generations.

    • Julie Yamamoto Says:

      Nancy – I would love to see this idea put into practice. There’s little chance we can get manufacturers to quit making the poisons, but it would be nice to have them feel obligated to make up for the damage, without having to file class-action lawsuits.

  4. Cobie Whitten Says:

    This is spot on, Julie – thank you for sending. Best,Cobie Cobie S. Whitten, PhD Psycho-Oncology Consultant cobwhitten@yahoo.com 360-789-7576

    • Julie Yamamoto Says:

      Thanks for reading, Cobie. As I hope the rates of cancer deaths continue to decline, I also hope the rate of new cancer cases does so as well. Thank you for the good work you do to help those affected by cancer.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: